
High-efficiency tank cleaning systems
Euroflow GmbH Alfa Laval Master Distributor in central and southern Germany
Alfa Laval tank cleaning equipment can help protect your processing operations. Optimizing your cleaning cycles is just as important as optimizing production efficiency. Efficient tank cleaning is vital to eliminate cross-contamination, leading to improved quality, productivity, and yield in any industry or application. With a wide range of tank cleaning solutions to choose from, selecting the appropriate tank cleaning machine can result in significant savings in time, water, and cleaning materials, bringing you closer to your sustainability objectives.
Types of industrial and hygienic tank cleaning equipment
Selecting the appropriate equipment depends on the size of the vessel and the tenacity of the residue. While a static spray ball is cost-effective for simple rinsing of water-soluble soils in small tanks, it often fails to reach the full coverage required for heavy soil loads or complex internal geometries. A rotary spray head provides improved wetting via fan-shaped jets, while a rotary jet head uses high-impact jets to strip away polymerised or viscous residues.
Comparison of cleaning methods
| Cleaning Method | Mechanism | Coverage | Typical Pressure | Flow Rate | Best Application | Alfa Laval Product |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Static spray ball | Fixed spray · gravity | Low · below 60% | 1–3 bar | Low | Small tanks · low soil | Alfa Laval SaniMidget |
| Rotary spray head | Slow rotation · fan | Medium · 70–80% | 2–4 bar | Medium | Moderate soil loads | Alfa Laval GJ |
| Rotary jet head | Rotating jets | High · 95–100% | 4–12 bar | Med/High | Large tanks · heavy soil | Alfa Laval Rotary Jet Head |
| High pressure jet | High impact | High | 50–200 bar | Low | Heavily fouled tanks | Alfa Laval Gamajet |
| Foam cleaning | Chemical adhesion | Medium | Low | Low | External surfaces | Not primary product |
| CIP recirculation | Full recirculation | Very high | 1–4 bar | High | Closed process tanks | Alfa Laval CIP unit |
Euroflow supports the transition from traditional methods to dynamic solutions like the TJ20G or the SaniJet series. These units utilise geared rotation around vertical and horizontal axes to ensure a successively denser pattern on the tank surface. For applications requiring full automation, pairing a retractor or spray head with sensing and control units allows for monitoring of the opening and closing cycles. Advanced models feature self-lubricating designs, using the cleaning media itself to lubricate internal gear trains, which eliminates the risk of lubricant contamination in hygienic zones.
Verified tank cleaning on every CIP cycle
Industries and process-fit for automated cleaning
Hygienic processing environments require specific CIP tank cleaning protocols to meet regulatory frameworks such as EHEDG and 3-A. In dairy and food production, the goal is often the removal of fats and proteins, requiring caustic concentrations of 1.5–2.0 percent at temperatures up to 80 °C. In contrast, brewery applications must address mineral scale and beer stone, necessitating a specific acid wash phase. Each industry has a unique requirement for rinse water quality, ranging from potable water in beverage production to purified water in the pharmaceutical sector.
Cleaning in place parameters by tank type
| Tank Type | Caustic Conc. | Caustic Temp. | Acid Conc. | Cycle Time | Alfa Laval Product |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Food process tank | 1.0–2.0% | 70–80 °C | 0.5–1.0% | 30–60 min | LKH pump · CIP unit |
| Dairy tank | 1.5–2.0% | 75–80 °C | 0.8–1.0% | 45–60 min | Alfa Laval GJ · LKH |
| Brewery tank | 1.5–2.0% | 70–75 °C | 0.5–1.0% | 45–60 min | Rotary Jet Head |
| Pharmaceutical | 1.0–1.5% | 70–75 °C | 0.5% | 30–45 min | Unique Mixproof valve |
| Biotech fermenter | 1.5–2.0% | 75–80 °C | 0.5–1.0% | 60–90 min | Spiral heat exchanger |
| Industrial storage | 2.0–3.0% | 60–80 °C | 1.0–2.0% | 60–120 min | Alfa Laval TJ20 |
Compliance depends on following established regulatory activities and documentation. Systems must align with standards from EHEDG and ISO to ensure drainability and cleanable design.
Regulatory and compliance framework
| Regulation | Issuing Body | Industry | Key Requirement | Validation Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HACCP | Codex | Food/Bev | Documented procedures | Cleaning validation |
| GMP · Eudralex | EMA | Pharma | Validated procedures | IQ · OQ · PQ |
| 21 CFR 110/211 | FDA | Food/Pharma | Sanitation records | Cleaning validation |
| EHEDG | EHEDG | Food/Pharma | Hygienic design | Design qualification |
| ISO 22716 | ISO | Personal Care | Sanitation docs | Procedure validation |
| ASME BPE | ASME | Biotech/Pharma | Surface finish | Design qualification |
For industrial sectors like ethanol or oil storage, the focus shifts toward powerful mechanical impact. Geared rotary jet heads in the Alfa Laval GJ 4 range are built for tanks up to 2,250 m³, providing a maximum throw length of up to 30.5 m to reach the extremities of large storage vessels. Euroflow engineers consider these industrial parameters, including the potential for recirculating particles up to 3 mm in certain models, to ensure the selected tank cleaning unit does not block or suffer premature wear.
Operating principles and selection of tank cleaning systems
Operating principles of rotary jet technology
A rotary jet head operates by converting the energy of the cleaning media flow into a geared rotation. As the media enters the unit, it passes through an internal gear train, causing the nozzles to rotate around both the vertical and horizontal axes. This dual-axis motion ensures that the high-impact jet stream follows a repeatable and successively denser pattern across the entire 360-degree interior surface of the vessel. In the first cycle, the nozzles lay out a coarse pattern, and subsequent cycles gradually fill the gaps until a full cleaning pattern is achieved. This mechanical impingement strips soil away through physical force, which is more effective than the cascading flow relied upon by static spray balls.
Steps for effective tank cleaning
| Step | Action | Critical Factor | Common Failure | Alfa Laval Product |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 · Pre-rinse | Water flush | Flow rate · duration | High soil load remains | LKH pump |
| 2 · Caustic | Hot caustic wash | Temp · concentration | Protein residue | Rotary Jet Head |
| 3 · Intermediate | Flush caustic | Conductivity endpoint | Acid neutralisation | CIP unit |
| 4 · Acid wash | Acid solution | Contact time | Mineral scale remains | Rotary Jet Head |
| 5 · Final rinse | Conductivity flush | Water quality · pH | Product contamination | CIP unit |
| 6 · Disinfection | Sanitisation | Temp · contact time | Biofilm remains | Plate heat exchanger |
| 7 · Verification | Measurement | Acceptance criteria | Skipping validation | Inline sensors |
Equipment selection and chemical compatibility
Choosing a tank cleaning system requires a detailed assessment of vessel volume and soil characteristics. For tanks below 500 litres, a static spray ball such as the SaniMidget is often sufficient. However, as volume increases or geometries involve agitators and baffles, dynamic equipment becomes necessary. Chemical selection is also vital; caustic solutions at 1.0–3.0 percent concentration and 70–85 °C are used for organic deposits, while nitric acid at 60–70 °C handles mineral scale.
Chemical selection guide
| Chemical Type | Active Agent | Temp. | Target Soil | Compatible Equipment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caustic · alkaline | Sodium hydroxide | 70–85 °C | Proteins · fats · oils | All sanitary units |
| Acid · nitric | Nitric acid | 60–70 °C | Mineral scale | All sanitary units |
| Acid · phosphoric | Phosphoric acid | 50–60 °C | Light deposits | All sanitary units |
| Peracetic acid | Peracetic acid | Ambient to 40 °C | Biofilm | All sanitary units |
| Chlorinated alkaline | Sodium hypochlorite | 50–60 °C | Microbial load | Sanitary units |
| Enzyme cleaner | Protease · lipase | 40–50 °C | Starch · proteins | All sanitary units |
Monitoring and validation
Validation is a key step in modern CIP tank cleaning, particularly in pharmaceutical and biotech applications where cGMP standards apply. Monitoring parameters such as conductivity and turbidity ensures that cleaning media has been fully removed and that no cross-contamination risk remains before production restart.
| Parameter | Measurement | Acceptance Criterion | Frequency | Alfa Laval Relevance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conductivity | Inline sensor | Below 1.3 to 10 μS/cm | Every cycle | CIP unit sensor |
| Turbidity | Inline sensor | Below 1 to 5 NTU | Every cycle | CIP unit sensor |
| Visual | Borescope | No visible residue | Per procedure | Manual check |
| pH | Inline sensor | Within 0.5 pH units | Every cycle | CIP unit sensor |
Sustainability and efficiency benchmarks
Shifting to high-efficiency rotary units provides documented reductions in water and chemical consumption. Traditional cleaning methods often consume high volumes of water to compensate for low mechanical force. By increasing impingement through rotary jet technology, an optimised system can reduce water consumption per cycle from a conventional range of 500–1,000 litres down to 150–300 litres, a reduction of 50–70 percent. Similarly, chemical consumption can be reduced from 10–20 kg per cycle to 4–8 kg per cycle, and total cycle time can be shortened from 90–120 minutes to 45–60 minutes through automated control.
| Parameter | Conv. Cleaning | Optimised | Reduction | Optimisation Method |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Water use | 500–1,000 L/cycle | 150–300 L/cycle | 50–70% | Rotary jet head |
| Energy use | 15–30 kWh/cycle | 5–12 kWh/cycle | 40–60% | Heat recovery |
| Chemicals | 10–20 kg/cycle | 4–8 kg/cycle | 40–60% | Dosing control |
| Cycle time | 90–120 min | 45–60 min | 30–50% | Automated control |
| Wastewater | 400–800 L/cycle | 120–250 L/cycle | 50–70% | Chemical recovery |
| Carbon footprint | High | Reduced 40–60% | 40–60% | Optimised cycle |
Are you interested?
FAQ